Abstract
Measurement is a process aimed at acquiring and codifying information
about properties of empirical entities. In this paper we provide an interpretation of
such a process comparing it with what is nowadays considered the standard measurement
theory, i.e., representational theory of measurement. It is maintained here that
this theory has its own merits but it is incomplete and too abstract, its main weakness
being the scant attention reserved to the empirical side of measurement, i.e., to
measurement systems and to the ways in which the interactions of such systems with
the entities under measurement provide a structure to an empirical domain. In particular
it is claimed that (1) it is on the ground of the interaction with a measurement
system that a partition can be induced on the domain of entities under measurement
and that relations among such entities can be established, and that (2) it is the usage
of measurement systems that guarantees a degree of objectivity and intersubjectivity
to measurement results. As modeled in this paper, measurement systems link the
abstract theory of measuring, as developed in representational terms, and the practice
of measuring, as coded in standard documents such as the International Vocabulary
of Metrology.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 123-149 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Synthese |
Volume | 175 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Intersubjectivity
- Measurement
- Subjectiy