Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The note comments on a group of judgments that deal with various issues concerning certain banking relationships and contracts (current account, "omnibus" guarantee), providing a broad picture of the state of doctrine and jurisprudence on the topics discussed.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Comments to App. Milano, 11 October 1988, App. Milano, 9 February 1988, Trib. Napoli, 18 March 1988, Trib. MiIano, 30 October 1988, on the subject of the probative effectiveness of the bank settlement statement, the appeal of the extract account, validity of ultra-legal interests, validity of the omnibus guarantee |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 220-227 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | BANCA BORSA E TITOLI DI CREDITO |
| Volume | 1990 |
| Publication status | Published - 1990 |
Keywords
- estratto conto, saldaconto, interessi ultralegali fideiussione omnibus
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Comments to App. Milano, 11 October 1988, App. Milano, 9 February 1988, Trib. Napoli, 18 March 1988, Trib. MiIano, 30 October 1988, on the subject of the probative effectiveness of the bank settlement statement, the appeal of the extract account, validity of ultra-legal interests, validity of the omnibus guarantee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver