Optimal risk allocation in the provision of local public services: Can a private insurer be better than a federal relief fund?

Gilberto Turati, Luigi Buzzacchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study the institutional solutions needed in a decentralized framework to cope with the potential adverse welfare effects caused by localized negative shocks, that impact on the provision of public services and that can be limited by precautionary investments. We consider first a public relief fund to cover these 'collective risks'. We analyse the underinvestment problem stemming from the moral hazard of Local administrations, when investments are defined at the local level and are not observable by the Central government that manages the relief fund. We then examine the potential role of private insurers in solving the underinvestment problem. Our analysis shows that the public fund is almost always a better institutional arrangement with respect to the private insurance solution, but competitive private insurers can improve social welfare in the presence of Central government's soft budget constraints problems, especially when the number of Local administrations is large.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)747-779
Number of pages33
JournalCESifo Economic Studies
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Collective risk
  • Public relief fund

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal risk allocation in the provision of local public services: Can a private insurer be better than a federal relief fund?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this