Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The European Court of Justice recently ruled on i
boundaries of applicability of art. 205 of the VAT directive. More precisely, the Union Judges
they stated that the provision in question should not be considered an obstacle to legislation
national under which the jointly liable must pay, in addition to the amount
of the value added tax (VAT) not paid by the debtor of this tax, the interest of
late payment due by the latter on this amount. Well, the conclusions formulated by the College
European would seem to lend themselves to at least two critical considerations - descendants from
an inadequate enhancement of the principle of proportionality and an incorrect, because reductive,
legal qualification of the default interest function - both on equal consideration
on the one hand relating to the framing of joint and several liability within the boundaries of which it would have
had to frame the case in question, on the other hand to the attribution of the right of reimbursement where the
unpaid tax was then paid both by the original debtor and by the person responsible in
solid.
| Translated title of the contribution | Failure to pay VAT and joint liability: some considerations in the margins of a recent (and not entirely convincing) decision of the CJEU |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1829-1861 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | DIRITTO E PRATICA TRIBUTARIA INTERNAZIONALE |
| Volume | VOL. XVIII-4 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- IVA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Failure to pay VAT and joint liability: some considerations in the margins of a recent (and not entirely convincing) decision of the CJEU'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver