[Autom. eng. transl.] In the presence of what assumptions a person has the right to oppose the republishing of a news that concerns him, in the past legitimately disseminated, to protect his interest (so-called to be forgotten) not to remain exposed indefinitely to the effects of a repeated disclosure of the same?
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] Oblivion and Chronicle: the delicate relationship between two "equally fundamental" rights|
|Title of host publication||I nuovi orientamenti della Cassazione civile|
|Number of pages||11|
|Publication status||Published - 2019|