Abstract
This chapter reflects on nudging and choice architecture in the light of how the concept of European citizenship has been designed. Since the beginning of the passage between the economic and the political European communities citizenship has been considered as a key element in legitimizing innovation both from the epistemic and the normative point of view. This role, however, has remained mostly theoretical, if not rhetorical; nonetheless, the pressures to speed-up governance in Europe have led to new regulatory soft practices (such as nudge) that challenge of citizenship. Two examples, dealing with health and digital privacy, where citizens are treated as ‘objects of concern and control’, reveal some of these ambiguities. In order to rethink nudging as a more legitimate form of normative innovation, the notions of Participatory Design and Rights-in-Design are proposed as ways to open up and reframe choice architectures by granting more robust epistemic and democratic credibility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Handbook of Behavioural Change and Public Policy |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| Pages | 148-162 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Volume | 2019 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978 1 78536 784 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
- General Psychology
Keywords
- Nudge
- behavioral sciences
- participatory rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nudging Citizens’ Knowledge in Knowledge-based EU – The case of breast cancer screening programmes and participatory rights in choice architectures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver