Nota a Corte cost. 26 maggio 2017, n. 127 in tema di successione fra normativa penale e normativa sanzionatoria amministrativa

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Note to Constitutional Court May 26, 2017, n. 127 regarding the succession between criminal law and administrative sanction law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The commented sentence is part of the line concerning decriminalization inaugurated by the Cost Court. April 7th 2017, n. 68, which considered the "presumption, from which the legislator moves, that the administrative sanction is in any case more favorable than the penal one"; in this way, for the facts committed before the entry into force of the decriminalization law, the problem of establishing which is in practice the heaviest sanctioning treatment has begun to arise, even when the transitional provision has opted for the application of the provision administrative sanction to the facts committed in the force of the penal law
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Note to Constitutional Court May 26, 2017, n. 127 regarding the succession between criminal law and administrative sanction law
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)3587-3590
Number of pages4
JournalIL FORO ITALIANO
Volume2017
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • CEDU
  • depenalizzazione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Note to Constitutional Court May 26, 2017, n. 127 regarding the succession between criminal law and administrative sanction law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this