Abstract
The essay focuses on the rethinking of the conceptual circle normativity-truth-validity as regards its projection on the theory of law. Starting from the perspective of the “law in action”, that is to say by considering the experience/behaviour of the “common man”, the classical distinction between truth validity can be rediscussed. This perspective is based on the concept of “common sense”: it is a very complex dimension composed by different strata and entails a new meditation on the pair “deontic-psychological” also in light of some Edmund Husserl’s clues. Accordingly, it is possible to grasp the pair truth-validity “in action” (i.e. within the common legal experience), in order to propose some “open” conclusions concerning the dimensions of law as well as the legal theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 226-236 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Phenomenology and Mind |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Truth, Validity, Common sense, Effectiveness
- Verità, validità, senso comune, effettività
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Normativity, Truth, Validity and Effectiveness. Remarks Starting from the Horizon of the “Common Sense”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver