Noninvasive Ventilation in a Pediatric Trauma Center: A Cohort Study

Marco Piastra*, Andrea De Bellis, Tony Christian Morena, Daniele De Luca, Lucilla Pezza, Alessandro Pizza, Orazio Genovese, Aldo Mancino, Enzo Picconi, Giorgio Conti

*Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether non-invasive ventilation (NIV) can avoid the need for tracheal intubation and/or reduce the duration of invasive ventilation (IMV) in previously intubated patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and developing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) after major traumatic injury. Study Design: A single center observational cohort study. Setting: Pediatric ICU in a University Hospital (tertiary referral Pediatric Trauma Centre) Population: During the 48-month study period, 276 patients (median age 6.4 years) with trauma were admitted to PICU; among 86 of them, who suffered from AHRF and received ventilation (IMV and/or NIV) for more than 12 hrs, 32 patients (median age 8.5 years) were treated with NIV. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: Inclusion criteria: at least 12 hours of NIV; exclusion criteria: patients with facial trauma or congenital malformations; patients receiving IMV <12 hours or perioperative ventilation. Measurements and Results: Among NIV patients, 27 (84,3%) were previously on IMV, while 5 (15,6%) could be managed exclusively with NIV. In patients with post-extubation respiratory distress, NIV was successful in 88.4% of cases. Before starting NIV, P/F ratio was 242.7 ± 71. After 8 hours of NIV treatment, a significant oxygenation improvement (PaO2/FiO2 = 354.3 ± 81; p = 0.0002) was found, with no significant changes in carbon dioxide levels. A trend toward increasing ventilation-free time has been evidenced; NIV resulted feasible and generally well tolerated. Conclusions: AHRF in trauma patients is multifactorial and may be due to many reasons, such as lung contusion, aspiration of blood or gastric contents. Systemic inflammatory response and transfusions may also contribute to hypoxia. Our pilot study strongly suggests that NIV can be applied in post-traumatic AHRF: it may successfully reduce the time of both invasive ventilation and deep sedation. Further data from controlled studies are needed to assess the advantage of NIV in pediatric trauma.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-184
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Intensive Care Medicine
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • intensive care
  • non-invasive ventilation
  • pediatric trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Noninvasive Ventilation in a Pediatric Trauma Center: A Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this