“Nolebat quod prevaleret falsitas veritati”: I falsi, Innocenzo III e lo stilus curiae

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] "He did not like what prevaleret false is" 1 false Innocenzo 3 e lo stile House

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The study of a jurisdictional case long debated both locally and in the papal curia between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries makes it possible to grasp the ways in which papal documents were falsified and the systems for recognizing forgeries and the authors of forgeries. In particular, a document in favour of the church of Paciliano (subject to the parish church of Casale Monferrato) attributed to Celestine III is carefully examined and, on the basis of internal and external elements, judged "false".
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] "He did not like what prevaleret false is" 1 false Innocenzo 3 e lo stile House
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationStilus – Modus – Usus. Regeln der Konflikt- und Verhandlungsführung am Papsthof des Mittelalters. Rules of Negotiation and Conflict Resolution at the Papal Court in the Middle Ages
Pages137-158
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Casale Monferrato
  • Decretali
  • Decretals
  • Falsi documenti papali
  • Innocent III
  • Innocenzo III
  • customs of the Roman Curia
  • diritti parrocchiali
  • falsifications of papal documents
  • parish rights
  • usi della curia papale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] "He did not like what prevaleret false is" 1 false Innocenzo 3 e lo stile House'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this