Multiple Myeloma Treatment in Real-world Clinical Practice: Results of a Prospective, Multinational, Noninterventional Study

Valerio De Stefano, Tommaso Za, Sergio Storti, Andrea Bacigalupo, Mohamad Mohty, Evangelos Terpos, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Michele Cavo, Sandra Lejniece, Meral Beksac, Mohamed Amine Bekadja, Wojciech Legiec, Meletios Dimopoulos, Svetlana Stankovic, Maria Soledad Durán, Alessandro Corso, Yulia Kochkareva, Edward Laane, Christian Berthou, Hans SalwenderZvenyslava Masliak, Valdas Pečeliūnas, Wolfgang Willenbacher, João Silva, Vernon Louw, Damir Nemet, Zita Borbényi, Uri Abadi, Robert Schou Pedersen, Peter Černelč, Anna Potamianou, Catherine Couturier, Caroline Feys, Florence Thoret-Bauchet, Mario Boccadoro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)


Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, with little information available on its management in real-world clinical practice. The results of the present prospective, noninterventional observational study revealed great diversity in the treatment regimens used to treat MM. Our results also provide data to inform health economic, pharmacoepidemiologic, and outcomes research, providing a framework for the design of protocols to improve the outcomes of patients with MM. Background: The present prospective, multinational, noninterventional study aimed to document and describe real-world treatment regimens and disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients and Methods: Adult patients initiating any new MM therapy from October 2010 to October 2012 were eligible. A multistage patient/site recruitment model was applied to minimize the selection bias; enrollment was stratified by country, region, and practice type. The patient medical and disease features, treatment history, and remission status were recorded at baseline, and prospective data on treatment, efficacy, and safety were collected electronically every 3 months. Results: A total of 2358 patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 775 and 1583 did and did not undergo stem cell transplantation (SCT) at any time during treatment, respectively. Of the patients in the SCT and non-SCT groups, 49%, 21%, 14%, and 15% and 57%, 20%, 12% and 10% were enrolled at treatment line 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4, respectively. In the SCT and non-SCT groups, 45% and 54% of the patients had received bortezomib-based therapy without thalidomide/lenalidomide, 12% and 18% had received thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy without bortezomib, and 30% and 4% had received bortezomib plus thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy as frontline treatment, respectively. The corresponding proportions of SCT and non-SCT patients in lines 2, 3, and ≥ 4 were 45% and 37%, 30% and 37%, and 12% and 3%, 33% and 27%, 35% and 32%, and 8% and 2%, and 27% and 27%, 27% and 23%, and 6% and 4%, respectively. In the SCT and non-SCT patients, the overall response rate was 86% to 97% and 64% to 85% in line 1, 74% to 78% and 59% to 68% in line 2, 55% to 83% and 48% to 60% in line 3, and 49% to 65% and 36% and 45% in line 4, respectively, for regimens that included bortezomib and/or thalidomide/lenalidomide. Conclusion: The results of our prospective study have revealed great diversity in the treatment regimens used to manage MM in real-life practice. This diversity was linked to factors such as novel agent accessibility and evolving treatment recommendations. Our results provide insight into associated clinical benefits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e401-e419
Publication statusPublished - 2018


  • Bortezomib
  • Global
  • Observational study
  • Routine practice
  • Stem cell transplantation


Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple Myeloma Treatment in Real-world Clinical Practice: Results of a Prospective, Multinational, Noninterventional Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this