Multiculturalismo e processo penale

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Multiculturalism and criminal trial

Giulio Ubertis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] Having found the multiculturalism of our societies, it is necessary to avoid that the procedural mechanism presupposes for the judge or the parties the acceptance of a particular epistemological theory as much as to guarantee that the belonging to a cultural minority is judged by a subject able to understand the meaning of the conduct ascribed to him and placed in the condition of intervening in the procedural dialectic. The first objective is achievable by recognizing that the semantic conception of truth is the most adequate for judicial reconstruction of the fact. The second is obtained by prescribing the naturalness of the judge understood as his predisposition to understand the socio-cultural values involved in the process and safeguarding the right to an interpreter for the accused who does not understand the language used in the proceedings.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Multiculturalism and criminal trial
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationLa condizione giuridica di Rom e Sinti in Italia. Atti del Convegno internazionale, II
Pages1127-1135
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventLa condizione giuridica di Rom e Sinti in Italia - Milano
Duration: 16 Jun 201018 Jun 2010

Conference

ConferenceLa condizione giuridica di Rom e Sinti in Italia
CityMilano
Period16/6/1018/6/10

Keywords

  • Culturally motivated crime
  • Interprete
  • Interpreter
  • Judicial truth
  • Multiculturalism
  • Multiculturalismo
  • Naturalità del giudice
  • Naturalness of the judge
  • Reato culturalmente motivato
  • Verità giudiziale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Multiculturalism and criminal trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this