Abstract
The paper analyzes the controversial issue of the role in which migrants rescued at sea must be heard in the proceedings for the crime of aiding illegal entry: as witnesses or as suspects of a related crime, the latter represented by the illegal entry contravention ex art. 10-bis l. n. 941/2009. Considering that the arrival of the foreigner in Italian territory (land surface or coastal sea) without a regular document inevitably integrates the details of the aforementioned crime, the opening of a criminal proceeding appears to be a duty, with the consequence that the migrant must be questioned as a defendant in related proceedings. The opposite solution of hearing the migrant as a witness is detrimental to the right of defense, as well as to the principle that the rules of criminal procedure must be laid down by law.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Migrant rescued at sea: suspect or witness? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 56-77 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | JUS |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Imputato in procedimento connesso
- Migrante
- Principio di legalità
- Reato di immigrazione clandestina
- Testimone
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Migrant rescued at sea: suspect or witness?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver