Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization

  • Filippo Crea
  • , Cathleen Noel Bairey Merz
  • , John F Beltrame
  • , Colin Berry
  • , Paolo G Camici
  • , Juan Carlos Kaski
  • , Peter Ong
  • , Carl J Pepine
  • , Udo Sechtem
  • , Hiroaki Shimokawa
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Australia
  • Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre
  • San Raffaele Scientific Institute
  • St. George's University of London
  • Robert Bosch Foundation
  • University of Florida
  • Tohoku University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Persistence or recurrence of angina after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may affect about 20-40% of patients during short-medium-term follow-up. This appears to be true even when PCI is 'optimized' using physiology-guided approaches and drug-eluting stents. Importantly, persistent or recurrent angina post-PCI is associated with a significant economic burden. Healthcare costs may be almost two-fold higher among patients with persistent or recurrent angina post-PCI vs. those who become symptom-free. However, practice guideline recommendations regarding the management of patients with angina post-PCI are unclear. Gaps in evidence into the mechanisms of post-PCI angina are relevant, and more research seems warranted. The purpose of this document is to review potential mechanisms for the persistence or recurrence of angina post-PCI, propose a practical diagnostic algorithm, and summarize current knowledge gaps.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2455-2462
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction
  • Coronary spasm
  • Coronary stenosis
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Stable angina

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this