Management of the kidney transplant patient with Cancer: Report from a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference

Jacopo Romagnoli, Stefan Hohaus, Roberto Iezzi, Ketty Peris, Giovanni Schinzari, Giovanni Scambia, Giampaolo Tortora, Vincenzo Valentini, Giuseppe Grandaliano, Luca Tagliaferri, Anna Acampora, Viola D'Ambrosio, Andrea D'Aviero, Elena Maiolo, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Alessandro Posa, Francesco Preziosi, Ernesto Rossi, Giuseppe Scaletta, Gionata SpagnolettiAlessandro Tanzilli, Valentina Bianchi, Ilaria Esposito, Valentina Lancellotta, Filippo Paoletti, Umberto Maggiore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Cancer is the second most common cause of mortality and morbidity in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). Immunosuppression can influence the efficacy of cancer treatment and modification of the immunosuppressive regimen may restore anti-neoplastic immune responses improving oncologic prognosis. However, patients and transplant physicians are usually reluctant to modify immunosuppression, fearing rejection and potential graft loss. Due to the lack of extensive and recognised data supporting how to manage the immunosuppressive therapy in KTRs, in the context of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and loco-regional treatments, a Consensus Conference was organised under the auspices of the European Society of Organ Transplantation and the Italian Society of Organ Transplantation. The conference involved a multidisciplinary group of transplant experts in the field across Europe. Methods The overall process included a) the formulation of 12 specific questions based on the PICO methodology, b) systematic literature review and summary for experts for each question, c) a two-day conference celebration and the collection of experts' agreements. The conference was articulated in three sessions: “Immunosuppressive therapy and immunotherapy”, “Systemic therapy”, “Integrated Therapy”, while the final experts' agreement was collected with a televoting procedure and defined according to the majority criterion. Results Twenty-six European experts attended the conference and expressed their vote. A total of 14 statements were finally elaborated and voted. Strong agreement was found for ten statements, moderate agreement for two, moderate disagreement for one and uncertainty for the last one. Conclusions The consensus statements provide guidance to transplant physicians caring for kidney transplant recipients with cancer and indicate key aspects that need to be addressed by future clinical research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100636-N/AA
JournalTransplantation Reviews
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Kidney transplant
  • Multidisciplinary consensus
  • Personalised medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of the kidney transplant patient with Cancer: Report from a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this