Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of serious meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: what are the limits?

  • Im Gould
  • , Roberto Cauda
  • , S Esposito
  • , F Gudiol
  • , T Mazzei
  • , J. Garau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Severe (life-threatening) meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to be treated with vancomycin despite accumulating evidence of poor outcome, increasing resistance and unachievable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) susceptibility breakpoint for vancomycin was recently reduced to 2mg/L. Whilst the great majority of clinical isolates are thus still classified as susceptible, the available clinical evidence argues for a method-dependent breakpoint of 0.5mg/L (broth dilution) or 1.0mg/L (Etest), which would classify many strains as resistant, or at best intermediate. However, automated susceptibility testing systems are not currently capable of performing accurately at this low level, and such low breakpoints are unsatisfactory because the poor reproducibility of tests (plus or minus one doubling dilution) results in a critical non-reproducibility around the modal MIC of 1mg/L described in most published data. Therefore, vancomycin should be used with caution in severe (life-threatening) staphylococcal disease and the MIC should always be reported by method. Daptomycin is generally preferred for bacteraemia/endocarditis and linezolid for pneumonia. Better outcome data for vancomycin, based on achievable PK/PD targets and using robust MIC tests, are urgently required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)202-209
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Volume2011
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Antibiotics
  • MIC drift
  • MRSA treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of serious meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: what are the limits?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this