Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

L’Unione europea tra «associazione d’impresa» e «associazione civile». L’ambivalenza dell’Europa nella «lente inattuale» di Michael Oakeshott

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The European Union between "business association" and "civil association". The ambivalence of Europe in Michael Oakeshott's "outdated lens"

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

This essay analyses the contemporary debate on European integration in the light of Michael Oakeshott’s political thought. Even though Oakeshott refused to express any opinion on the European project, his ideas offer an interpretative framework according to which the European Union can be understood as both a coercive association (what Oakeshott called a universitas) and an association allowing some autonomy to its members (a societas). The essay considers these issues in the light of Oakeshott’s interpretation of British idealism and Benedetto Croce’s thought, showing the ambivalent character of political organisations and its relation to technocratic discourse and reasoning.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The European Union between "business association" and "civil association". The ambivalence of Europe in Michael Oakeshott's "outdated lens"
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)131-150
Number of pages20
JournalFilosofia Politica
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Brexit, European Union, Technocracy, Teleocracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The European Union between "business association" and "civil association". The ambivalence of Europe in Michael Oakeshott's "outdated lens"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this