Abstract
Inappropriate lighting is one of the most common causes of visual disturbances in office workers. Visual demand can also lead to musculoskeletal problems such as tension neck syndrome. On the other hand, appropriate location
of light sources and a suitable level of illumination can enhance visual capacity. A rational approach to visual risk
assessment of tasks and workstations involves measurements in the occupational visual field, and in particular
luminance measurement. We report a large scale photometric evaluation in six companies in northern and central
Italy. Operator tasks were predominantly administrative with some computer aided design activity.
Occupational visual field luminance ratios were found to be excessively high (>1:250 cd/m2) in 19% of
workstations (n = 100), moderately high (1:100-1:250 cd/m2) in 20% and considered satisfactory (<1:100 cd/
m2) in 61%. Illuminance in the working plane ranged from 100-2500 lux and correlated poorly with luminance.
Parameters were highly dependent on light fitting position and window location.
The survey demonstrated shortcomings in lighting design and workstation layout, both from artificial and
natural sources. It is recommended that photometric assessment incorporate both luminance (occupational visual
field) and illuminance measurements
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-28 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Occupational asthenopia
- office lighting
- visual risk assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Luminance In the Occupational Visual Field: An Evaluation of Office Workstations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver