[Autom. eng. transl.] SUMMARY: 1. Introduction. 2. The organizational power in the jurisprudence: a) The rigid typification of the organizational publicistic power. 3. (follows) b) The non-existence of a necessary provisional foundation for the choice made with privatistic determination. 4. (continues) c) The exclusion of the participation of 'third party' subjects in the formation of the private decision. 5. The differences with the administrative activity of private law. 6. Concluding remarks: the overcoming of a dogma?
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] The organization of public offices "in private form" twenty years after privatization|
|Number of pages||16|
|Journal||ADL. ARGOMENTI DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO|
|Publication status||Published - 2015|