Abstract
Taking as its starting points two questionable judgments of the Constitutional Court (nn. 296-297/2012), the essay investigates the provision of some social and health services to the disabled and the elderly. These services are not charge-free; therefore inequalities may arise with regard to access and enjoy-ment of them. Due to inconsistencies in statute and case-law, a new regulation is required to ensure that the burden of non-self-sufficiency is not left on the shoulders of disadvantaged families, but is shared among all the citizens, through general taxation.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] LIVEAS or not LIVEAS. The right to assistance and the reform of the Isee in two conflicting pronouncements |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 4615-4622 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | GIURISPRUDENZA COSTITUZIONALE |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Isee
- LIVEAS
- assistenza
- integrazione sociosanitaria
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] LIVEAS or not LIVEAS. The right to assistance and the reform of the Isee in two conflicting pronouncements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver