L’interazione tra assoggettamento alla disciplina antiriciclaggio e regime di libera prestazione di servizi finanziari. Nota alla sentenza Sentenza della Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea (Terza Sezione) del 25 aprile 2013 – Causa C-212/11 – Jyske Bank Gibraltar Ltd contro Administración del Estado

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The interaction between subjection to the anti-money laundering discipline and the freedom to provide financial services regime. Note to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2013 - Case C-212/11 - Jyske Bank Gibraltar Ltd v Administración del Estado

Paolo Arginelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The article traces and comments on the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Section) of 25 April 2013, in Case C-212/11, in which the Court addressed, among others, the issue of balancing between Member States' need to prevent the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing with the need to guarantee the right of European financial institutions to operate in states other than that of their main establishment in freedom to provide services
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The interaction between subjection to the anti-money laundering discipline and the freedom to provide financial services regime. Note to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2013 - Case C-212/11 - Jyske Bank Gibraltar Ltd v Administración del Estado
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)34-37
Number of pages4
JournalNOVITÀ FISCALI
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Diritto dell'Unione europea
  • Disciplina antiriciclaggio
  • Libera prestazione di servizi

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The interaction between subjection to the anti-money laundering discipline and the freedom to provide financial services regime. Note to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2013 - Case C-212/11 - Jyske Bank Gibraltar Ltd v Administración del Estado'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this