Linee interpretative su Platone negli ultimi cinquant'anni della "Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica"

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Interpretive lines on Plato in the last fifty years of the "Journal of Neo-Scholastic Philosophy"

Marialuisa Gatti*

*Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] In this article I critically analyze, from a methodological and content point of view, the studies on Plato - in the context of the studies on the history of ancient philosophy - published in the "Journal of Neo-scholastic Philosophy" in the period between the fifties and the first decade of the year 2000. In this period I identified three different interpretative phases, often linked to the theoretical and historiographic coordinates of priority in the Journal and in the philosophical thought of the Catholic University. It is a phase in which a theoretical-metaphysical interest predominated, another in which the debate on the so-called "unwritten Doctrines" was central, until the last, increasingly focused on the deepening of the dialogues of Plato and the bottom lines of his thought For these phases I presented for the first time, with accurate bibliographic notes, both an overall reconstruction of the hermeneutic background lines relating to Plato, and a detailed critical analysis of the individual contributions, which I contextualized in the international scientific debate gradually developed.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Interpretive lines on Plato in the last fifty years of the "Journal of Neo-Scholastic Philosophy"
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)33-70
Number of pages38
JournalRIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEOSCOLASTICA
Volume1-3 /2009
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • ERMENEUTICA
  • HERMENEUTICS
  • METAPHYSICS
  • ONTOLOGIA
  • ORALITA'
  • PLATO
  • PLATONE
  • PLATONISM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Interpretive lines on Plato in the last fifty years of the "Journal of Neo-Scholastic Philosophy"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this