Abstract
We study optimal linear licensing and its social welfare implications when
the innovator (patentee) is an insider that can make capacity/output
commitment so as to act as a Stackelberg leader in the output market.
We show that (i) the patentee’s profit-maximizing licensing contract is a
royalty; (ii) the optimal royalty rate is greater than the cost reduction
attained by the licensed technology and is increasing in the number of
competitors; (iii) optimal licensing maximizes the likelihood of technology
transfer, may reduce social welfare and always makes consumers worse off; and (iv) the innovator benefits from capacity commitment, and the more competitive the output market, the greater the gains it makes by licensing. The opposite holds for consumers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 582-598 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Manchester School |
Volume | 73 |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- innovation
- licensing