Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

L’ennesimo contrasto giurisprudenziale sulla prescrizione dell’indennità ex art.2, settimo comma d. lgs. n.80/1992

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Yet another jurisprudential contrast on the prescription of the indemnity ex art.2, seventh paragraph d. lgs. n.80 / 1992
  • Matteo Corti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The sentence note deals with the vexata quaestio of the date from which the limitation period pursuant to art. 2, co. 7, d. lgs. n. 80/1992, aimed at restoring the damage from failure to promptly transpose Directive 80/987 / EEC.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Yet another jurisprudential contrast on the prescription of the indemnity ex art.2, seventh paragraph d. lgs. n.80 / 1992
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)184-188
Number of pages5
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • D. Lgs. n. 80/1992
  • Indennità ex art. 2, co. 7

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Yet another jurisprudential contrast on the prescription of the indemnity ex art.2, seventh paragraph d. lgs. n.80 / 1992'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this