Abstract
The author comments on the decision of the Constitutional Court n. 95/2016, which affirmed the conformity to the Constitution of the public employment regulation containing the prohibition of paying indemnities for the annual leave not enjoyed. The author concludes that, notwithstanding the constitutional conformity, it is doubtful that the regulation is consistent with the principle of the European law in this field.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Crisis legislation and right to holidays: the difficult balancing acts of the Constitutional Court, known to the Constitutional Court. May 6, 2016, n. 95 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1129-1134 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | DIRITTO DELLE RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI |
| Volume | XXVI |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Art. 31, comma 2, Carta diritti fondamentali UE
- Art. 36, comma 3, Cost.
- Art. 5, comma 8, d.l. 6 luglio 2012, n. 95, convertito in l. 7 agosto 2012, n. 135
- Art. 7, direttiva 2003/88/CE
- Diritto alle ferie
- Indemnity for annual leave not enjoyed
- Indennità sostitutiva delle ferie non godute
- Pubblico impiego
- Public employment
- Right to paid annual leave
- Sect. 31, subs. 2, EU Charter of fundamental rights
- Sect. 36, subs. 3, Const.
- Sect. 5, subs. 8, decree law 6 July 2012, n. 95, converted into law 7 August 2012, n. 135
- Sect. 7, directive 2003/88/EC