Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The article, structured in the form of a response to the Questionnaire on the subsidiary reform under discussion in the Parliament (referred to in the bill approved in the text unified by the Chamber on June 30, 2011), is an opportunity to attempt a reflection on the coordinates and the results of a new filiation law. It intends to deal with the general issues of the reform, addressing the nature of the status of the family and examining the prejudicial constitutional legitimacy to which the reform can only be submitted, under the double profile of art. 29 and of the art. 30 of the Constitution In this perspective, the approach to which it is inspired can ideally be summarized in the sensitivity to the instance of suppression of the distinction between the two states of filiation, provided that it underlies a cultural operation that reaches the arrival of separation between parentage and marriage but beware of the drift of indifference of the subsidiary to marriage.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The answers to the questionnaire |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 219-227 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | IUSTITIA |
| Volume | LXV |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- diritto di famiglia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The answers to the questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver