La tutela processuale della terzietà e imparzialità del giudice: si può fare di più?

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The procedural protection of the third party and impartiality of the judge: can we do more?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution aims to outline and re-elaborate the framework of procedural remedies aimed at ensuring the physiological exercise of jurisdictional power and the right to a third and impartial judge and to remedy any pathologies attributable to the lack of neutrality of the judge
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The procedural protection of the third party and impartiality of the judge: can we do more?
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)812-838
Number of pages27
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO E PROCEDURA PENALE
VolumeLV
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • difetto di imparzialità e terzietà
  • giudice
  • incompatibilità

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The procedural protection of the third party and impartiality of the judge: can we do more?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this