[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution focuses on the "protection of competition" clause in art. 117, co. 2, lett. e) Const., to which the Constitutional Court seemed to attribute a potentially indefinite and indeterminate character over the years. Such a clause, as if it were a passepartout, would thus always be legitimized to be used much more than as a mere non-material matter, overlapping with other transversal competences and thus going to deeply scratch, up to annihilate, concurrent and residual regional competence.
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] The protection of competition as a state passepartout in the tangled tangle of local public services.|
|Number of pages||19|
|Journal||IL DIRITTO DELL'ECONOMIA|
|Publication status||Published - 2009|
- Titolo V
- servizi pubblici locali
- tutela della concorrenza