Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The comment analyzes one of the first rulings of the Supreme Court of Cassation on the problem of the omissive responsibility of administrators without powers after the reform of company law. The work delves into, in particular, the two central issues faced by the judges of legitimacy: the limits of the guarantee position of non-executive directors after the amendment of the articles. 2381 and 2392 of the Civil Code, together with the consequent problem of the succession of extra-criminal laws that define the powers and duties of non-executive directors, and the principles that govern the trial of fraud in the case of failure to prevent the crime committed by the managing directors.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme Court of Cassation and the non-executive liability of non-executive directors after the corporate law reform. |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 109-125 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | CASSAZIONE PENALE |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Posizione di garanzia
- Responsabilità degli amministratori non esecutivi
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme Court of Cassation and the non-executive liability of non-executive directors after the corporate law reform.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver