La riflessione kierkegaardiana sulla prima triade della Logica hegeliana alla luce della "meontologia" di Schelling.

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Kierkegaard's reflection on the first triad of Hegelian logic in the light of Schelling's "meontology".

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The article shows how in Kierkegaard's treatment of the concept of possibility (in the "Concept of Anxiety" and in the contemporary "Philosophical Fragments" (1844 ), for instance, there seems to be possible to make out Schelling's meontology; I refer to the distinction Schelling regained from Plato's Sophist [237 a ss., 256 d ss., 258 a ss.] Between the Greek "subjective" and "objective" negation in the creation. While the Greek negation ouk totally denies the reality of something both in thought and actuality, the negation me just denies the actual being of something Kierkegaard stresses reality in a system that is something constantly "possible" and never completed. To include something in a system means - as we saw - to transform it, through rational comprehension, to something that is necessary, it means to misrepresent it. Nevertheless, Schelling had been able to include not-being in its system, taking it as something existing, but in the way of possibility. Kierkegaard emphasizes in the Interlude of the Philosophical Fragments, when he talks about historical comprehension.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Kierkegaard's reflection on the first triad of Hegelian logic in the light of Schelling's "meontology".
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)41-55
Number of pages15
JournalNOTA BENE
Volume2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • esistenza
  • meontologia
  • negazione
  • possibilità

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Kierkegaard's reflection on the first triad of Hegelian logic in the light of Schelling's "meontology".'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this