Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The foundation of the intervention of the joint sections: a critical analysis of the 2003-2008 case law evolution. Existentialist thinking. The three reasons that had justified the circulation of the existential model: a critical examination. The alleged, different content of existential damage with respect to biological damage and non-pecuniary damage. The so-called tripartite division of non-pecuniary damage and the comparison between existential damage and "new" non-pecuniary damage (damage to the rights of the person with constitutional significance). The constitutional significance of non-pecuniary damage. The supposed reduction of the compensation "quantum" and the principle of full reparation of the damage.
Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The expected exclusion of existential damage and the principle of full damage repair: towards a new system for repairing personal injury |
---|---|
Original language | Italian |
Pages (from-to) | 90-95 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Keywords
- danno alla persona