Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The writing highlights the significant shortcomings of the canonical criminal procedure in safeguarding the declared respect for the presumption of innocence of the accused and, in general, the defense guarantees. Emphasis is placed on the problems of managing criminal proceedings even through extrajudicial, i.e. administrative, means. A reflection is carried out on the purposes of the criminal trial (to tell the truth or to condemn?), in comparison with the criminal procedural system in state law. We hope for openness, even in the canonical sphere, to methods of 'restorative justice'
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The presumption of innocence in canon law |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Title of host publication | Diritto penale canonico. Dottrina, prassi e giurisprudenza della Curia Romana |
| Pages | 233-245 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Volume | XV |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- garanzie nel processo penale canonico
- riforma penale canonica
- procedimento canonico giudiziale ed extragiuudizialetali
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The presumption of innocence in canon law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver