La «precisazione» nella giurisprudenza dei giudici ordinari di merito

[Autom. eng. transl.] It reconstructs and comments on the reception by the civil and penal judges of the merits of the clarification formulated by the sentence of the Constitutional Court n. 269 of 2017 regarding the so-called double bias. After having reconstructed the aims, technical means and objectives of this theoretical construction, he surveys and classifies some cases of application, or otherwise, of it, finally formulating a summary framework and some evaluations, mainly positive on the double prejudice and the results it achieves, except that on one point: it should be clarified whether and in what terms it applies, if the antinomy with the sources of EU law exists not only with respect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, but also and simultaneously with respect to other sources, even of derivative law.