La philosophie du langage en Italie face aux sciences du langage et aux études textuelles

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The philosophy of language in Italy in the face of language sciences and textual studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] Even if it is not a sufficient condition for the institutionalization of a discipline and even less of a necessary condition in a decisive way, the founders of a research discipline (them precisely, and not others ) are however a posteriori "fundamental" for the construction of a knowledge become a discipline. This is at least the thesis that I will now try to prove, starting from the human resources, from those present at the origins and from those that allowed the origins. In the case of the origins of the philosophy of language (PDL), in Italy, how did things go? The question was put directly to Tullio de Mauro (Rome La Sapienza) to Andrea Bonomi (Milan, Università Statale) and to Umberto Eco (Bologna). These are three very different stories. 1 For
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The philosophy of language in Italy in the face of language sciences and textual studies
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalHISTOIRE ÉPISTÉMOLOGIE LANGAGE
VolumeDossier n° 5
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • disciplinarisation
  • histoire
  • langage
  • linguistique
  • philosophie
  • philosophy of language
  • sémiotique

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The philosophy of language in Italy in the face of language sciences and textual studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this