Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] Even if it is not a sufficient condition for the institutionalization of a discipline and even less of a necessary condition in a decisive way, the founders of a research discipline (them precisely, and not others ) are however a posteriori "fundamental" for the construction of a knowledge become a discipline. This is at least the thesis that I will now try to prove, starting from the human resources, from those present at the origins and from those that allowed the origins. In the case of the origins of the philosophy of language (PDL), in Italy, how did things go? The question was put directly to Tullio de Mauro (Rome La Sapienza) to Andrea Bonomi (Milan, Università Statale) and to Umberto Eco (Bologna). These are three very different stories. 1 For
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The philosophy of language in Italy in the face of language sciences and textual studies |
|---|---|
| Original language | French |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | HISTOIRE ÉPISTÉMOLOGIE LANGAGE |
| Volume | Dossier n° 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- disciplinarisation
- histoire
- langage
- linguistique
- philosophie
- philosophy of language
- sémiotique