Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The paper intends to analyze the arrest of the Constitutional Court which declares the provision in par. 2, art. 702 ter of the code proc. civ. and identifies the power to order the change of the rite in the summarized forms of the court seised, where the defendant proposes a counterclaim devolved to collegial knowledge, but prejudicial to the one proposed in the main way. The solution reached by the Court, already widely envisaged by the doctrine, leaves various questions unresolved, where it does not provide for a duty on the part of the judge of the summary to convert the rite, but only a power of a discretionary nature which, therefore, does not exclude the risk - although warned by the same Constitutional Court - of the conflict between judges.
Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The partial constitutional illegitimacy of art. 702 ter co. 2 cod. proc. civ., continuing problems following the ruling of the Constitutional Court. |
---|---|
Original language | Italian |
Pages (from-to) | 546-557 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA |
Volume | 2021 |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- PROCESSO SOMMARIO DI COGNIZIONE