La parziale illegittimità costituzionale dell’art. 702 ter co. 2 cod. proc. civ., perduranti problemi a valle della pronuncia della Corte costituzionale.

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The partial constitutional illegitimacy of art. 702 ter co. 2 cod. proc. civ., continuing problems following the ruling of the Constitutional Court.

Riccardo Martinoli*

*Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The paper intends to analyze the arrest of the Constitutional Court which declares the provision in par. 2, art. 702 ter of the code proc. civ. and identifies the power to order the change of the rite in the summarized forms of the court seised, where the defendant proposes a counterclaim devolved to collegial knowledge, but prejudicial to the one proposed in the main way. The solution reached by the Court, already widely envisaged by the doctrine, leaves various questions unresolved, where it does not provide for a duty on the part of the judge of the summary to convert the rite, but only a power of a discretionary nature which, therefore, does not exclude the risk - although warned by the same Constitutional Court - of the conflict between judges.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The partial constitutional illegitimacy of art. 702 ter co. 2 cod. proc. civ., continuing problems following the ruling of the Constitutional Court.
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)546-557
Number of pages12
JournalLA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA
Volume2021
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • PROCESSO SOMMARIO DI COGNIZIONE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The partial constitutional illegitimacy of art. 702 ter co. 2 cod. proc. civ., continuing problems following the ruling of the Constitutional Court.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this