[Autom. eng. transl.] The sentence that is commented upon offers the opportunity for a reflection on the state of health of the theory of the so-called warning signs in the jurisprudence jurisprudence, finally used to demonstrate the existence of the only polarity representative of the intent, and without which they can draw, sic et simpliciter, evidence of voluntary coefficients. The ruling is also appreciated for the evaluation of the meaning to be assigned to a particular phenomenology - the so-called compliant behavior, held by the non-executive administrator who disables the board meetings - and carefully avoids falling into the trap of the so-called willful blindness, theory from the North American ancestry which, to facilitate the test of the volitional sphere, sanctions an undue equation between wanting not to know what is knowable and wanting to realize the illicit.
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] The ostrich's move: the warning signs between willful blindness and willful misconduct as will|
|Number of pages||6|
|Publication status||Published - 2016|
- comportamento compiacente
- segnali di allarme