Abstract
This paper aims to examine the relevance of Bontadini’s analysis of «Contemporaryism». Bontadini introduced this historical-philosophical category to denote that contemporary philosophy is primarily characterized by a strong anti-metaphysical perspective on knowledge \r\nand experience. In order to evaluate the inconsistency of this «Anti-Metaphysicism» – exemplified by Neopositivism – the paper will first emphasize the role of Bontadini’s «Neoclassical Philosophy» in the broader context of Western philosophy’s development. Consequently, the historical and theoretical significance of Neoclassical Philosophy will be highlighted through its metaphysics, understood as a rational discussion of «anthropological differences». In this regard, the paper will ultimately underscore the originality of Bontadini’s non-dogmatic conception of metaphysics, which is based on acknowledging the richness of experience and the capacity for reason to be open-ended.
| Translated title of the contribution | Metaphysics as a philosophy of anthropological differences |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 729-741 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica |
| Volume | CVX |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Antropologia trascendentale
- Classical Metaphysics
- Contemporary Philosophy
- Filosofia contemporanea
- Gustavo Bontadini
- Metafisica classica
- Neopositivism
- Neopositivismo
- Transcendental Anthropology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Metaphysics as a philosophy of anthropological differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver