La metafisica come filosofia delle differenze antropologiche

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Metaphysics as a philosophy of anthropological differences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the relevance of Bontadini’s analysis of «Contemporaryism». Bontadini introduced this historical-philosophical category to denote that contemporary philosophy is primarily characterized by a strong anti-metaphysical perspective on knowledge and experience. In order to evaluate the inconsistency of this «Anti-Metaphysicism» – exemplified by Neopositivism – the paper will first emphasize the role of Bontadini’s «Neoclassical Philosophy» in the broader context of Western philosophy’s development. Consequently, the historical and theoretical significance of Neoclassical Philosophy will be highlighted through its metaphysics, understood as a rational discussion of «anthropological differences». In this regard, the paper will ultimately underscore the originality of Bontadini’s non-dogmatic conception of metaphysics, which is based on acknowledging the richness of experience and the capacity for reason to be open-ended.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Metaphysics as a philosophy of anthropological differences
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)729-741
Number of pages13
JournalRivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica
VolumeCVX
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Gustavo Bontadini, Classical Metaphysics, Contemporary Philosophy, Neopositivism, Transcendental Anthropology
  • Gustavo Bontadini, Metafisica classica, Filosofia contemporanea, Neopositivismo, Antropologia trascendentale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Metaphysics as a philosophy of anthropological differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this