Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The relationship between anthropology and technosciences is evaluated in the opposite direction by Anders and Sloterdijk and re-proposes the meaning that can be assigned to humanism today. In this regard, the contribution of Guardini that aims to overcome the combination of the paradigm of nature and that of the machine is interesting.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The anthropological machine and the question of the self. Which humanism? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Title of host publication | Il prisma dell'umano all'incrocio dei saperi. |
| Editors | Antonio Sabetta, Marco Staffolani |
| Pages | 101-117 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- io
- ragione
- soggetto
- umanesimo
- uomo
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The anthropological machine and the question of the self. Which humanism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver