La giurisprudenza milanese sul "risparmio tradito": un'analisi quantitativa

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The Milanese jurisprudence on "betrayed savings": a quantitative analysis

Andrea Perrone, Matteo Musitelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article we resort to quantitative research methodologies to identify and evaluate current trends in civil litigation concerning alleged violation of investor protection laws. To this end we examined a dataset of 195 judicial decisions rendered by the Milan Lower Court between 2007 and 2009, in cases brought against investment service providers after three major financial debacles (namely the Argentina, Cirio and Parmalat defaults). The data analysis leads to several meaningful conclusions: besides a general equilibrium between decisions in favor and against plaintiffs - and notwithstanding the traditional respect for the statute of frauds - the amount of attention given to the client's profile and the relevance to substantive arguments demonstrates that judicial decision making is mainly oriented towards corrective justice.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The Milanese jurisprudence on "betrayed savings": a quantitative analysis
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)158-175
Number of pages17
JournalGIURISPRUDENZA COMMERCIALE
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • giurisprudenza milanese
  • risparmio tradito

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The Milanese jurisprudence on "betrayed savings": a quantitative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this