La Corte Suprema alla prese con un caso di bad science: il giudizio di affidabilità scientifica tra i rischi di volgarizzazione e di acritica accettazione del sapere tecnico

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme Court grappling with a bad science case: the judgment of scientific reliability between the risks of vulgarization and uncritical acceptance of technical knowledge

Giovanni Celani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme Court returns to reiterate, in the context of the doctor's criminal liability, the importance of the criteria of reliability and credibility of scientific knowledge for the purpose of a correct judicial evaluation of the technical test
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme Court grappling with a bad science case: the judgment of scientific reliability between the risks of vulgarization and uncritical acceptance of technical knowledge
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1532-1553
Number of pages22
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI MEDICINA LEGALE E DEL DIRITTO IN CAMPO SANITARIO
Volume2019
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Prova scientifica
  • Responsabilità medica

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The Supreme Court grappling with a bad science case: the judgment of scientific reliability between the risks of vulgarization and uncritical acceptance of technical knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this