Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The inadmissibility decision taken by the Committee on the Rights of the Child
the same in the case of Sacchi and others v. Argentina and others has come under criticism for the re-
guidance on the interpretation of the requirement of the prior exhaustion of internal appeals. The de-
However, the decision also contains progressive provisions, marked by a careful
consideration of the effects of climate change, such as to occur well beyond i
borders of the national territory of a State, thus compromising enjoyment
of the rights enshrined in the Convention to a much wider and more articulated extent than
a strictly territorial interpretation of the notion of jurisdiction, on the one hand,
and the status of victim, on the other, allow us to appreciate
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] The Committee on the Rights of the Child pronounces itself on climate change: strengths and weaknesses of the decision Sacchi and others v. Argentina and others |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 33-47 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | QUADERNI DI SIDIBLOG |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- cambiamento climatico – diritti umani – equità intergenerazionale – superiore interesse del minore – ambiente – giurisdizione extraterritoriale
- climate change -human rights -intergenerational equity - best interest of the child - extraterritorial jurisdiction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] The Committee on the Rights of the Child pronounces itself on climate change: strengths and weaknesses of the decision Sacchi and others v. Argentina and others'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver