Abstract
Collaborative goal setting in patient–provider communication with chronic patients is the phase in which – after collecting the data regarding the patient’s health – it is necessary
to make a decision regarding the best therapy and behaviors the patient should adopt until the next encounter. Although it is considered a pivotal phase of shared decision making, there
remain a few open questions regarding its components and its efficacy: What are the factors that improve or impede agreement on treatment goals and strategies?; What are the ‘success conditions’ of collaborative goal setting?; How can physicians effectively help patients make their
preferences explicit and then co-construct with them informed preferences to help them reach
their therapeutic goals? Using the theoretical framework of dialogue types, an approach developed in the field of Argumentation Theory, it
will be possible to formulate hypotheses on the ‘success conditions’ and effects on patient commitment of collaborative goal setting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 103-115 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Communication and Medicine |
| Volume | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- argumentation schemes
- chronic care
- decision making
- deliberation dialogue
- doctor– patient communication
- presumptive reasoning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Key components of effective collaborative goal setting in the chronic care encounter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver