Abstract
The first part of this article is devoted to the comparison between interregnum and\r\ndictatorship comitiorum habendorum causa, whose different requirements are highlighted for\r\ntheir establishment. In light of this comparison, the paper aims to demonstrate that the dictatorship of Q. Fabius Maximus in 217 b.C. was established by means of an interregnum, as stated\r\nin the Fasti Capitolini, and not through a popular vote, as claimed by Livy and other sources.
| Translated title of the contribution | Interregnum and Dictatorship Comitiorum Habendorum Causa: the case of Q. Fabio Massimo in 217 BC |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 125-140 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | AEVUM |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Dictatorship comitiorum habendorum causa
- Dittatura comitiorum habendorum causa
- Fasti Capitolini
- Interregnum
- Q. Fabio Massimo
- Quintus Fabius Maximus
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interregnum and Dictatorship Comitiorum Habendorum Causa: the case of Q. Fabio Massimo in 217 BC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver