Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer: step by step in the foggy landscape

  • Paolo Morgagni
  • , Maria Bencivenga*
  • , Fatima Carneiro
  • , Stefano Cascinu
  • , Sarah Derks
  • , Maria Di Bartolomeo
  • , Claire Donohoe
  • , Clarisse Eveno
  • , Suzanne Gisbertz
  • , Peter Grimminger
  • , Ines Gockel
  • , Heike Grabsch
  • , Paulo Kassab
  • , Rupert Langer
  • , Sara Lonardi
  • , Marco Maltoni
  • , Sheraz Markar
  • , Markus Moehler
  • , Daniele Marrelli
  • , Maria Antonietta Mazzei
  • Davide Melisi, Carlo Milandri, Paul Stefan Moenig, Bianca Mostert, Gianni Mura, Wojciech Polkowski, John Reynolds, Luca Saragoni, Mark I. Van Berge Henegouwen, Richard Van Hillegersberg, Michael Vieth, Giuseppe Verlato, Lorena Torroni, Bas Wijnhoven, Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio, Han-Kwang Yang, Franco Roviello, Giovanni de Manzoni, William Allum, Giulio Bagnacci, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Felix Berlth, Laura Borgno, Jimmy So Bok Yan, Riccardo Caccialanza, Francesco Casella, Claudia Castelli, Mikael Chevallay, Simona Corso, Paulo Matos Da Costa, Mariagiulia Dal Cero, Maurizio De Giuli, Stefano De Pascale, Annibale Donini, Domenico D'Ugo, Giorgio Ercolani, Federica Filippini, Massimo Framarini, Ewelina Frejlich, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Simone Giacopuzzi, Silvia Giordano, Luigina Graziosi, Henk Hartgrink, Arnulf H. Hölscher, Jeesun Kim, Tiuri Kroese, Lourenco Laercio Gomes, Lucio Lara Santos, Drolaiz Liu, Florian Lordick, Luigi Marano, Elisabetta Marino, Giovanni Martinelli, Hans-Joachim Meyer, Silvia Ministrini, Paul F. Mansfield, Chiara Molinari, Manlio Monti, Yusef Moulla, Magnus Nilsson, Sara Patuzzo, Manuel Pera, Osvaldo Antonio Prado Castro, Alberto Quinzii, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, Stefano Rausei, Rossella Reddavid, Fausto Rosa, Riccardo Rosati, Romina Rossi, Giandomenico Roviello, Julia Rudno-Rudzinska, Michele Sacco, Massimiliano Salati, Paul M. Schneider, Leonardo Solaini, Masanori Terashima, Anna Tomezzoli, Martina Valgiusti, Antonio Carlos Weston, Kielan Wojciech, Goetze Thortsen, null null
*Corresponding author
  • Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital
  • Ospedale Policlinico
  • Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • St James Hospital and Trinity College Dublin
  • CHU de Lille
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Leipzig University
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • University of Leeds
  • Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Santa Casa de São Paulo
  • Johannes Kepler University Linz
  • IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto - Padova
  • IRCCS Istituto scientifico romagnolo per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Meldola (FC)
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Siena
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
  • University of Verona
  • IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
  • University of Geneva
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Medical University of Lublin
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Utrecht University
  • Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH
  • Erasmus Medical Center
  • University of Brescia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Background: Many gastric cancer patients in Western countries are diagnosed as metastatic with a median overall survival of less than twelve months using standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatments, like targeted therapy or immunotherapy, have recently proved to ameliorate prognosis, but a general agreement on managing oligometastatic disease has yet to be achieved. An international multi-disciplinary workshop was held in Bertinoro, Italy, in November 2022 to verify whether achieving a consensus on at least some topics was possible.\r\n\r\nMethods: A two-round Delphi process was carried out, where participants were asked to answer 32 multiple-choice questions about CT, laparoscopic staging and biomarkers, systemic treatment for different localization, role and indication of palliative care. Consensus was established with at least a 67% agreement.\r\n\r\nResults: The assembly agreed to define oligometastases as a "dynamic" disease which either regresses or remains stable in response to systemic treatment. In addition, the definition of oligometastases was restricted to the following sites: para-aortic nodal stations, liver, lung, and peritoneum, excluding bones. In detail, the following conditions should be considered as oligometastases: involvement of para-aortic stations, in particular 16a2 or 16b1; up to three technically resectable liver metastases; three unilateral or two bilateral lung metastases; peritoneal carcinomatosis with PCI ≤ 6. No consensus was achieved on how to classify positive cytology, which was considered as oligometastatic by 55% of participants only if converted to negative after chemotherapy.\r\n\r\nConclusion: As assessed at the time of diagnosis, surgical treatment of oligometastases should aim at R0 curativity on the entire disease volume, including both the primary tumor and its metastases. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery on the residual volume of disease, which was initially not resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons but nevertheless responded to first-line treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)672-674
Number of pages3
JournalGastric Cancer
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancer Research

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Multimodal treatment
  • Oligometastatic gastric cancer
  • Stage IV
  • Staging.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer: step by step in the foggy landscape'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this