In tema di arbitrato degli investimenti e giurisdizione dello Stato

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Regarding investment arbitration and state jurisdiction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay analyzes the investor-State arbitration in connection with concepts of civil procedure law, as deriving from the State sovereignty. The author notes that the consent to investment arbitration enhances the application of the party autonomy principle. As a result, it may limit the long-established capacity of States with respect to internal remedies in investment disputes. At the same time, it is highlighted the risk of inconsistencies with the doctrine of res judicata, mainly when objected in investment arbitration proceedings on the basis of host State courts’ decisions. This can lead to possible different solutions on the same issue by other State courts in case of challenge of the awards or opposition to their enforcement. The last part of the study analyses the “European approach” to investor-State arbitration and the proposals aiming at preventing conflicts of decisions rendered in investment arbitrations and State court proceedings.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Regarding investment arbitration and state jurisdiction
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)545-582
Number of pages38
JournalEUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Arbitrato internazionale
  • Consenso degli Stati all'arbitrato degli investimenti
  • Convenzione di New York in materia di arbitrato internazionale
  • Convenzione di Washington in materia di arbitrato degli investimenti
  • Giurisdizione dello Stato
  • Trattati degli investimenti

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Regarding investment arbitration and state jurisdiction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this