Implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research and stakeholders' perspectives: Systematic review

Stefania Boccia, Maria Luisa Di Pietro, Drieda Zace, Evelien De Sutter, Drieda Zaçe, David Geerts, Pascal Borry, Isabelle Huys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is one of the key elements in biomedical research. The introduction of electronic informed consent can be a way to overcome many challenges related to paper-based informed consent; however, its novel opportunities remain largely unfulfilled due to several barriers. Objective: We aimed to provide an overview of the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups in order to assist responsible implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search using Web of Science (Core collection), PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, and PsycARTICLES. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for reporting this work. We included empirical full-text studies focusing on the concept of electronic informed consent in biomedical research covering the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface domains. Studies written in English and published from January 2010 onward were selected. We explored perspectives of different stakeholder groups, in particular researchers, research participants, health authorities, and ethics committees. We critically appraised literature included in the systematic review using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed methods studies, and Jadad tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 40 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in the type of study design, population, intervention, research context, and the tools used. Most of the studies' populations were research participants (ie, patients and healthy volunteers). The majority of studies addressed barriers to achieving adequate understanding when using electronic informed consent. Concerns shared by multiple stakeholder groups were related to the security and legal validity of an electronic informed consent platform and usability for specific groups of research participants. Conclusions: Electronic informed consent has the potential to improve the informed consent process in biomedical research compared to the current paper-based consent. The ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives outlined in this review might serve to enhance the future implementation of electronic informed consent.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJMIR. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Biomedical research
  • Digital health
  • Informed consent
  • Research ethics
  • Systematic review
  • User interface

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research and stakeholders' perspectives: Systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this