TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Application and Outcomes: Analysis in the “Lazio Network” Database
AU - Grieco, Michele
AU - Galiffa, Giampaolo
AU - Marcellinaro, Rosa
AU - Santoro, Emanuele
AU - Persiani, Roberto
AU - Mancini, Stefano
AU - Di Paola, Massimiliano
AU - Santoro, Roberto
AU - Stipa, Francesco
AU - Crucitti, Antonio
AU - Carlini, Massimo
AU - Spoletini, Domenico
AU - Russo, Giulia
AU - Menditto, Rosa
AU - Palla, Filippo
AU - Giorgetti, Gian Marco
AU - Pernazza, Graziano
AU - Marino, Paola
AU - De Luca, Laura
AU - Mancini, Raffaello
AU - Pende, Vito
AU - Lirici, Marco
AU - Falbo, Francesco
AU - D'Ugo, Domenico
AU - Sollazzi, Liliana
AU - Mele, Maria Cristina
AU - Lorenzon, Laura
AU - Gasbarrini, Antonio
AU - Pezzuto, Roberto
AU - Rinninella, Emanuele
AU - Cintoni, Marco
AU - Adducci, Enrica
AU - Belardi, Augusto
AU - Bonasera, Elena
AU - Cappelloni, Daniela
AU - Angeloni, Riccardo
AU - Minieri, Luciana
AU - Sagnotta, Andrea
AU - Folliero, Gloria
AU - Solinas, Luigi
AU - Arturi, Alessandro
AU - Ferraris, Corrado
AU - Capuano, Giorgio
AU - Romeo, Gherardo
AU - Amodio, Pietro Maria
AU - Carnevale, Sara
AU - Sansonetti, Andrea
AU - Tierno, Simone Maria
AU - Mazzari, Andrea
AU - Mazzari, Mario Attilio
AU - Diamanti, Paolo
AU - Muccichini, Lucilla
AU - Menghetti, Damiano
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced ERAS program application in colorectal surgery across hospitals in the Lazio region (central district in Italy) participating in the “Lazio Network” project. Methods: A multi-institutional database was constructed. All patients included in this study underwent elective colorectal surgery for both malignant and benign disease between January 2019 and December 2020. Emergency procedures were excluded. The population was divided into 2 groups: a pre-COVID-19 group (PG) of patients operated on between February and December 2019 and a COVID-19 group (CG) of patients operated on between February and December 2020, during the first 2 waves of the pandemic in Italy. Results: The groups included 622 patients in the PG and 615 in the CG treated in 8 hospitals of the network. The mean number of items applied was higher in the PG (65.6% vs. 56.6%, p < 0.001) in terms of preoperative items (64.2% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001), intraoperative items (65.0% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001), and postoperative items (68.8% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). Postoperative recovery was faster in the PG, with a shorter time to first flatus, first stool, autonomous mobilization and discharge (6.82 days vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.021). Postoperative complications, mortality and reoperations were similar among the groups. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the application of ERAS in the centers of the “Lazio Network” study group, with a reduction in adherence to the ERAS protocol in terms of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative items. In addition, in the CG, the patients had worse postoperative outcomes with respect to recovery and discharge.
AB - Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced ERAS program application in colorectal surgery across hospitals in the Lazio region (central district in Italy) participating in the “Lazio Network” project. Methods: A multi-institutional database was constructed. All patients included in this study underwent elective colorectal surgery for both malignant and benign disease between January 2019 and December 2020. Emergency procedures were excluded. The population was divided into 2 groups: a pre-COVID-19 group (PG) of patients operated on between February and December 2019 and a COVID-19 group (CG) of patients operated on between February and December 2020, during the first 2 waves of the pandemic in Italy. Results: The groups included 622 patients in the PG and 615 in the CG treated in 8 hospitals of the network. The mean number of items applied was higher in the PG (65.6% vs. 56.6%, p < 0.001) in terms of preoperative items (64.2% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001), intraoperative items (65.0% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001), and postoperative items (68.8% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). Postoperative recovery was faster in the PG, with a shorter time to first flatus, first stool, autonomous mobilization and discharge (6.82 days vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.021). Postoperative complications, mortality and reoperations were similar among the groups. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the application of ERAS in the centers of the “Lazio Network” study group, with a reduction in adherence to the ERAS protocol in terms of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative items. In addition, in the CG, the patients had worse postoperative outcomes with respect to recovery and discharge.
KW - ERAS
KW - Nutrition
KW - Surgery
KW - ERAS
KW - Nutrition
KW - Surgery
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/232017
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-022-06694-8
DO - 10.1007/s00268-022-06694-8
M3 - Article
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 46
SP - 2288
EP - 2296
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
ER -