Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of MELD 30-allocation policy on liver transplant outcomes in Italy

  • M. Ravaioli*
  • , Q. Lai
  • , M. Sessa
  • , D. Ghinolfi
  • , G. Fallani
  • , D. Patrono
  • , Sandro S. Di
  • , Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
  • , F. Odaldi
  • , J. Bronzoni
  • , F. Tandoi
  • , Carlis R. De
  • , M. M. Pascale
  • , G. Mennini
  • , G. Germinario
  • , M. Rossi
  • , Salvatore Agnes
  • , Carlis L. De
  • , M. Cescon
  • , R. Romagnoli
  • Simone P. De
*Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background & Aims: In Italy, since August 2014, liver transplant (LT) candidates with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores ≥30 receive national allocation priority. This multicenter cohort study aims to evaluate time on the waiting list, dropout rate, and graft survival before and after introducing the macro-area sharing policy. Methods: A total of 4,238 patients registered from 2010 to 2018 were enrolled and categorized into an ERA-1 Group (n = 2,013; before August 2014) and an ERA-2 Group (n = 2,225; during and after August 2014). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of receiving a LT or death between the two eras. The Fine-Gray model was used to estimate the HR for dropout from the waiting list and graft loss, considering death as a competing risk event. A Fine-Gray model was also used to estimate risk factors of graft loss. Results: Patients with MELD ≥30 had a lower median time on the waiting list (4 vs.12 days, p <0.001) and a higher probability of being transplanted (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.78–2.90; p = 0.001) in ERA-2 compared to ERA-1. The subgroup analysis on 3,515 LTs confirmed ERA-2 (odds ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.46–0.68; p = 0.001) as a protective factor for better graft survival rate. The protective variables for lower dropouts on the waiting list were: ERA-2, high-volume centers, no competition centers, male recipients, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The protective variables for graft loss were high-volume center and ERA-2, while MELD ≥30 remained related to a higher risk of graft loss. Conclusions: The national MELD ≥30 priority allocation was associated with improved patient outcomes, although MELD ≥30 was associated with a higher risk of graft loss. Transplant center volumes and competition among centers may have a role in recipient prioritization and outcomes. Clinical trial number: NCT04530240 Lay summary: Italy introduced a new policy in 2014 to give national allocation priority to patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥30 (i.e. very sick patients). This policy has led to more liver transplants, fewer dropouts, and shorter waiting times for patients with MELD ≥30. However, a higher risk of graft loss still burdens these cases. Transplant center volumes and competition among centers may have a role in recipient prioritization and outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-627
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology

Keywords

  • ECD
  • HCC
  • Liver Transplantation
  • MELD

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of MELD 30-allocation policy on liver transplant outcomes in Italy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this