Abstract
Researchers often make use of linear regression models in order to assess the
impact of policies on target outcomes. In a correctly specified linear regression
model, the marginal impact is simply measured by the linear regression coefficient.
However, when dealing with both synchronic and diachronic spatial data, the
interpretation of the parameters is more complex because the effects of policies
extend to the neighboring locations. Summary measures have been suggested in the
literature for the cross-sectional spatial linear regression models and spatial panel
datamodels. Inthis article,wecompare threeprocedures fortestingthesignificance
ofimpactmeasuresinthespatiallinearregressionmodels.Theseproceduresinclude
(i) the estimating equation approach, (ii) the classical delta method, and (iii) the
simulationmethod.InaMonteCarlostudy,wecomparethefinitesampleproperties
of these procedures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-36 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | International Regional Science Review |
Volume | 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- spatialeconometricmodels,spatialautoregressivemodels,impactmeasures, asymptotic approximation, standard errors, inference, MLE, direct effects, indirect effects, total effects